币圈项目融资信息
币圈项目融资信息
Follow Topic
1.22M Views
1.28K Discussions
Topic Background
区块链项目融资详情一网打尽,助力你发现更好的撸毛机会!
CryptoMubai
CryptoMubai
Crypto Newbie
56m ago
Let's analyze today's $BTC trend: From a candlestick chart perspective, the price has been suppressed below the moving average for several days, breaking below the 20-day moving average and the Bollinger Band middle line, indicating a weak short-term trend. The bears are still in control, but momentum is weakening. The MACD histogram shows that the downward momentum is weaker than in previous days, indicating that although the price is still falling, the selling pressure is not as strong as before. The RSI is around 46, not yet in the oversold zone, suggesting there may be further downside potential. On the hourly chart, the price is being suppressed by a descending trendline, with resistance around 69200. If it cannot break above this level, the rebound will be limited. The Fear & Greed Index has fallen to around 10, indicating extreme fear, suggesting that retail investors are panicked. Interestingly, institutions seem to have stayed—data shows that Bitcoin ETFs saw a net inflow of $1.3 billion in March, and whales have cumulatively bought over 40,000 BT. Retail investors are selling at a loss, while institutions are accumulating shares. This contrarian signal historically often indicates that the market is nearing its bottom. Upside resistance: 69000-70000 Downside support: 67000-66000 Short-term trend is slightly weak and volatile, like being pulled back and forth within a "range," lacking a clear direction. The overall structure remains bearish. Institutions are quietly accumulating, but retail investor confidence is weak, making further declines possible! Be aware of the risks. #CZ says Bitcoin is a hard asset #Trump's 48-hour ultimatum {future}(BTCUSDT)
Let's analyze today's $BTC trend:

From a candlestick chart perspective, the price has been suppressed below the moving average for several days, breaking below the 20-day moving average and the Bollinger Band middle line, indicating a weak short-term trend.

The bears are still in control, but momentum is weakening. The MACD histogram shows that the downward momentum is weaker than in previous days, indicating that although the price is still falling, the selling pressure is not as strong as before.

The RSI is around 46, not yet in the oversold zone, suggesting there may be further downside potential.

On the hourly chart, the price is being suppressed by a descending trendline, with resistance around 69200. If it cannot break above this level, the rebound will be limited.

The Fear & Greed Index has fallen to around 10, indicating extreme fear, suggesting that retail investors are panicked. Interestingly, institutions seem to have stayed—data shows that Bitcoin ETFs saw a net inflow of $1.3 billion in March, and whales have cumulatively bought over 40,000 BT.

Retail investors are selling at a loss, while institutions are accumulating shares. This contrarian signal historically often indicates that the market is nearing its bottom.

Upside resistance: 69000-70000

Downside support: 67000-66000

Short-term trend is slightly weak and volatile, like being pulled back and forth within a "range," lacking a clear direction. The overall structure remains bearish. Institutions are quietly accumulating, but retail investor confidence is weak, making further declines possible! Be aware of the risks.

#CZ says Bitcoin is a hard asset #Trump's 48-hour ultimatum

{future}(BTCUSDT)
FinanceRun
FinanceRun
Crypto Newbie
1h ago
Fidelity Sends Letter to SEC: Tokenized Asset Regulation Should Not Be "One Token, One Rule," Differentiated Rules and Regulatory Models Needed On March 22, Fidelity Investments, a US asset management company, sent a letter to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), responding to the SEC's earlier public comment period. In the letter, Fidelity Investments called on the SEC to further refine its regulatory framework, primarily addressing matters related to brokers offering, custodian, and trading crypto assets on alternative trading systems (ATS). The letter emphasized that developing a comprehensive regulatory framework and clear rules for trading tokenized securities is "crucial," including rules governing the trading of tokenized securities issued by third parties. The letter pointed out that tokenized instruments have different issuance structures, legal attributes, and valuation models. For example, tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) encompass entirely different asset classes such as stocks, real estate, bonds, or private credit. Fidelity further explains that tokenization models differ significantly in structure and the rights granted to holders. Some models allow indirect access to underlying securities through security interests, while others restrict participation to qualified contract investors based on security swaps. This structural difference means the tokenization market is already "layered," requiring regulatory oversight that avoids a one-size-fits-all approach. Differentiated rules must be developed for different models; otherwise, compliance is impossible. Furthermore, because DeFi financial trading platforms lack a central authority and cannot generate detailed financial reports as required by the SEC, Fidelity urges the SEC to bridge the regulatory gap between CeFi and DeFi trading systems and consider how they should evolve and coexist. In response, Fidelity recommends that the SEC issue guidance allowing brokers to utilize distributed ledger technology for alternative trading systems and other record-keeping, aiming to alleviate unnecessary financial reporting burdens for decentralized systems by modifying reporting requirements. In summary, Fidelity's letter reveals that some RWAs are merely digital shells of traditional securities, while others have become high-barrier contract derivatives, clearly inconsistent with a unified market regulatory logic. Fidelity's demands are straightforward: either break down the rules into smaller, more manageable sections, or stifle innovation in the industry. The SEC's response will determine how fast CeFi can grow and how far the DeFi world can go. #TokenizedSecurities
Fidelity Sends Letter to SEC: Tokenized Asset Regulation Should Not Be "One Token, One Rule," Differentiated Rules and Regulatory Models Needed

On March 22, Fidelity Investments, a US asset management company, sent a letter to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), responding to the SEC's earlier public comment period.

In the letter, Fidelity Investments called on the SEC to further refine its regulatory framework, primarily addressing matters related to brokers offering, custodian, and trading crypto assets on alternative trading systems (ATS).

The letter emphasized that developing a comprehensive regulatory framework and clear rules for trading tokenized securities is "crucial," including rules governing the trading of tokenized securities issued by third parties.

The letter pointed out that tokenized instruments have different issuance structures, legal attributes, and valuation models. For example, tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) encompass entirely different asset classes such as stocks, real estate, bonds, or private credit.

Fidelity further explains that tokenization models differ significantly in structure and the rights granted to holders. Some models allow indirect access to underlying securities through security interests, while others restrict participation to qualified contract investors based on security swaps.

This structural difference means the tokenization market is already "layered," requiring regulatory oversight that avoids a one-size-fits-all approach. Differentiated rules must be developed for different models; otherwise, compliance is impossible.

Furthermore, because DeFi financial trading platforms lack a central authority and cannot generate detailed financial reports as required by the SEC, Fidelity urges the SEC to bridge the regulatory gap between CeFi and DeFi trading systems and consider how they should evolve and coexist.

In response, Fidelity recommends that the SEC issue guidance allowing brokers to utilize distributed ledger technology for alternative trading systems and other record-keeping, aiming to alleviate unnecessary financial reporting burdens for decentralized systems by modifying reporting requirements.

In summary, Fidelity's letter reveals that some RWAs are merely digital shells of traditional securities, while others have become high-barrier contract derivatives, clearly inconsistent with a unified market regulatory logic.

Fidelity's demands are straightforward: either break down the rules into smaller, more manageable sections, or stifle innovation in the industry. The SEC's response will determine how fast CeFi can grow and how far the DeFi world can go.

#TokenizedSecuritiesFidelity Sends Letter to SEC: Tokenized Asset Regulation Should Not Be "One Token, One Rule," Differentiated Rules and Regulatory Models Needed

On March 22, Fidelity Investments, a US asset management company, sent a letter to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), responding to the SEC's earlier public comment period.

In the letter, Fidelity Investments called on the SEC to further refine its regulatory framework, primarily addressing matters related to brokers offering, custodian, and trading crypto assets on alternative trading systems (ATS).

The letter emphasized that developing a comprehensive regulatory framework and clear rules for trading tokenized securities is "crucial," including rules governing the trading of tokenized securities issued by third parties.

The letter pointed out that tokenized instruments have different issuance structures, legal attributes, and valuation models. For example, tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) encompass entirely different asset classes such as stocks, real estate, bonds, or private credit.

Fidelity further explains that tokenization models differ significantly in structure and the rights granted to holders. Some models allow indirect access to underlying securities through security interests, while others restrict participation to qualified contract investors based on security swaps.

This structural difference means the tokenization market is already "layered," requiring regulatory oversight that avoids a one-size-fits-all approach. Differentiated rules must be developed for different models; otherwise, compliance is impossible.

Furthermore, because DeFi financial trading platforms lack a central authority and cannot generate detailed financial reports as required by the SEC, Fidelity urges the SEC to bridge the regulatory gap between CeFi and DeFi trading systems and consider how they should evolve and coexist.

In response, Fidelity recommends that the SEC issue guidance allowing brokers to utilize distributed ledger technology for alternative trading systems and other record-keeping, aiming to alleviate unnecessary financial reporting burdens for decentralized systems by modifying reporting requirements.

In summary, Fidelity's letter reveals that some RWAs are merely digital shells of traditional securities, while others have become high-barrier contract derivatives, clearly inconsistent with a unified market regulatory logic.

Fidelity's demands are straightforward: either break down the rules into smaller, more manageable sections, or stifle innovation in the industry. The SEC's response will determine how fast CeFi can grow and how far the DeFi world can go.

#TokenizedSecurities
Jamie Coutts CMT
Jamie Coutts CMT
Crypto Newbie
1h ago
For a decade, private equity firms have been touting low volatility and portfolio diversification. This is essentially volatility whitewashing. Not pricing in market capitalization doesn't mean there are no losses. It means problems won't be discovered until it's too late. And now, it's too late. Bitcoin's position is rising as the illusion of a fractional-reserve credit system for fiat currencies stumbles from one crisis to another. 🧵 Liquidity is under pressure. The MOVE index is soaring. The US Dollar Index (DXY) is nearing the warning line of 100.50. Credit conditions are tightening in private equity and AI-related sectors. Inflation expectations are currently rising significantly. The macroeconomic outlook is not optimistic. Stock markets are reacting sluggishly. However, this year, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) for major stock indices is diverging—prices are hitting new highs while momentum is waning. This is a typical late-cycle top pattern. The market expects a soft landing for the economy. But the credit market is not. Bitcoin's resilience last month stemmed from two factors. The capitulation sell-off triggered by the February lows cleared out previously accumulated leverage—the excessive leverage built up before 2025. Derivatives further compressed volatility before 2025. But this was merely structural support, not genuine strength. Given that all risk assets face typical 10-15% drops, this buffer no longer exists. The February lows have resurfaced. Inflows into Bitcoin ETFs surged again in March, but may have peaked and begun to decline. Short-term bearish, long-term bullish. Here's why. This is the range of risk traditional investors face. Since 2010, private equity fund assets under management have grown by over 570% and are projected to reach $32 trillion by 2030. Institutional investors' share of the private market has risen from 17% to 27% in a decade. 94% of high-net-worth investors now hold alternative investments. Its selling points are: low volatility, diversification, and uncorrelated returns. The reality, however, is: volatility for money laundering. Opaqueness does not equal stability. Asset prices are constantly adjusting. You simply cannot predict when this will happen. Now imagine what will happen to Bitcoin when all this happens. All risks will be repriced. But Bitcoin's volatility relative to traditional assets has been declining for years. Transparent ledger, real-time settlement. No valuation methods based on fantasy. The recommended weighting is for reference only. Actual allocation will increase, and the recommended weighting may increase accordingly. When the bailout plan arrives—and it will eventually—this asset will be the first to smell its scent. Despite the government/Federal Reserve's vehement denial of ample liquidity.
For a decade, private equity firms have been touting low volatility and portfolio diversification. This is essentially volatility whitewashing. Not pricing in market capitalization doesn't mean there are no losses. It means problems won't be discovered until it's too late. And now, it's too late.

Bitcoin's position is rising as the illusion of a fractional-reserve credit system for fiat currencies stumbles from one crisis to another. 🧵

Liquidity is under pressure. The MOVE index is soaring. The US Dollar Index (DXY) is nearing the warning line of 100.50. Credit conditions are tightening in private equity and AI-related sectors. Inflation expectations are currently rising significantly. The macroeconomic outlook is not optimistic.

Stock markets are reacting sluggishly. However, this year, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) for major stock indices is diverging—prices are hitting new highs while momentum is waning. This is a typical late-cycle top pattern. The market expects a soft landing for the economy. But the credit market is not.

Bitcoin's resilience last month stemmed from two factors. The capitulation sell-off triggered by the February lows cleared out previously accumulated leverage—the excessive leverage built up before 2025. Derivatives further compressed volatility before 2025. But this was merely structural support, not genuine strength. Given that all risk assets face typical 10-15% drops, this buffer no longer exists. The February lows have resurfaced.

Inflows into Bitcoin ETFs surged again in March, but may have peaked and begun to decline.

Short-term bearish, long-term bullish. Here's why. This is the range of risk traditional investors face. Since 2010, private equity fund assets under management have grown by over 570% and are projected to reach $32 trillion by 2030. Institutional investors' share of the private market has risen from 17% to 27% in a decade. 94% of high-net-worth investors now hold alternative investments. Its selling points are: low volatility, diversification, and uncorrelated returns. The reality, however, is: volatility for money laundering. Opaqueness does not equal stability. Asset prices are constantly adjusting. You simply cannot predict when this will happen.

Now imagine what will happen to Bitcoin when all this happens. All risks will be repriced. But Bitcoin's volatility relative to traditional assets has been declining for years. Transparent ledger, real-time settlement. No valuation methods based on fantasy. The recommended weighting is for reference only. Actual allocation will increase, and the recommended weighting may increase accordingly.

When the bailout plan arrives—and it will eventually—this asset will be the first to smell its scent.

Despite the government/Federal Reserve's vehement denial of ample liquidity.For a decade, private equity firms have been touting low volatility and portfolio diversification. This is essentially volatility whitewashing. Not pricing in market capitalization doesn't mean there are no losses. It means problems won't be discovered until it's too late. And now, it's too late.

Bitcoin's position is rising as the illusion of a fractional-reserve credit system for fiat currencies stumbles from one crisis to another. 🧵

Liquidity is under pressure. The MOVE index is soaring. The US Dollar Index (DXY) is nearing the warning line of 100.50. Credit conditions are tightening in private equity and AI-related sectors. Inflation expectations are currently rising significantly. The macroeconomic outlook is not optimistic.

Stock markets are reacting sluggishly. However, this year, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) for major stock indices is diverging—prices are hitting new highs while momentum is waning. This is a typical late-cycle top pattern. The market expects a soft landing for the economy. But the credit market is not.

Bitcoin's resilience last month stemmed from two factors. The capitulation sell-off triggered by the February lows cleared out previously accumulated leverage—the excessive leverage built up before 2025. Derivatives further compressed volatility before 2025. But this was merely structural support, not genuine strength. Given that all risk assets face typical 10-15% drops, this buffer no longer exists. The February lows have resurfaced.

Inflows into Bitcoin ETFs surged again in March, but may have peaked and begun to decline.

Short-term bearish, long-term bullish. Here's why. This is the range of risk traditional investors face. Since 2010, private equity fund assets under management have grown by over 570% and are projected to reach $32 trillion by 2030. Institutional investors' share of the private market has risen from 17% to 27% in a decade. 94% of high-net-worth investors now hold alternative investments. Its selling points are: low volatility, diversification, and uncorrelated returns. The reality, however, is: volatility for money laundering. Opaqueness does not equal stability. Asset prices are constantly adjusting. You simply cannot predict when this will happen.

Now imagine what will happen to Bitcoin when all this happens. All risks will be repriced. But Bitcoin's volatility relative to traditional assets has been declining for years. Transparent ledger, real-time settlement. No valuation methods based on fantasy. The recommended weighting is for reference only. Actual allocation will increase, and the recommended weighting may increase accordingly.

When the bailout plan arrives—and it will eventually—this asset will be the first to smell its scent.

Despite the government/Federal Reserve's vehement denial of ample liquidity.For a decade, private equity firms have been touting low volatility and portfolio diversification. This is essentially volatility whitewashing. Not pricing in market capitalization doesn't mean there are no losses. It means problems won't be discovered until it's too late. And now, it's too late.

Bitcoin's position is rising as the illusion of a fractional-reserve credit system for fiat currencies stumbles from one crisis to another. 🧵

Liquidity is under pressure. The MOVE index is soaring. The US Dollar Index (DXY) is nearing the warning line of 100.50. Credit conditions are tightening in private equity and AI-related sectors. Inflation expectations are currently rising significantly. The macroeconomic outlook is not optimistic.

Stock markets are reacting sluggishly. However, this year, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) for major stock indices is diverging—prices are hitting new highs while momentum is waning. This is a typical late-cycle top pattern. The market expects a soft landing for the economy. But the credit market is not.

Bitcoin's resilience last month stemmed from two factors. The capitulation sell-off triggered by the February lows cleared out previously accumulated leverage—the excessive leverage built up before 2025. Derivatives further compressed volatility before 2025. But this was merely structural support, not genuine strength. Given that all risk assets face typical 10-15% drops, this buffer no longer exists. The February lows have resurfaced.

Inflows into Bitcoin ETFs surged again in March, but may have peaked and begun to decline.

Short-term bearish, long-term bullish. Here's why. This is the range of risk traditional investors face. Since 2010, private equity fund assets under management have grown by over 570% and are projected to reach $32 trillion by 2030. Institutional investors' share of the private market has risen from 17% to 27% in a decade. 94% of high-net-worth investors now hold alternative investments. Its selling points are: low volatility, diversification, and uncorrelated returns. The reality, however, is: volatility for money laundering. Opaqueness does not equal stability. Asset prices are constantly adjusting. You simply cannot predict when this will happen.

Now imagine what will happen to Bitcoin when all this happens. All risks will be repriced. But Bitcoin's volatility relative to traditional assets has been declining for years. Transparent ledger, real-time settlement. No valuation methods based on fantasy. The recommended weighting is for reference only. Actual allocation will increase, and the recommended weighting may increase accordingly.

When the bailout plan arrives—and it will eventually—this asset will be the first to smell its scent.

Despite the government/Federal Reserve's vehement denial of ample liquidity.For a decade, private equity firms have been touting low volatility and portfolio diversification. This is essentially volatility whitewashing. Not pricing in market capitalization doesn't mean there are no losses. It means problems won't be discovered until it's too late. And now, it's too late.

Bitcoin's position is rising as the illusion of a fractional-reserve credit system for fiat currencies stumbles from one crisis to another. 🧵

Liquidity is under pressure. The MOVE index is soaring. The US Dollar Index (DXY) is nearing the warning line of 100.50. Credit conditions are tightening in private equity and AI-related sectors. Inflation expectations are currently rising significantly. The macroeconomic outlook is not optimistic.

Stock markets are reacting sluggishly. However, this year, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) for major stock indices is diverging—prices are hitting new highs while momentum is waning. This is a typical late-cycle top pattern. The market expects a soft landing for the economy. But the credit market is not.

Bitcoin's resilience last month stemmed from two factors. The capitulation sell-off triggered by the February lows cleared out previously accumulated leverage—the excessive leverage built up before 2025. Derivatives further compressed volatility before 2025. But this was merely structural support, not genuine strength. Given that all risk assets face typical 10-15% drops, this buffer no longer exists. The February lows have resurfaced.

Inflows into Bitcoin ETFs surged again in March, but may have peaked and begun to decline.

Short-term bearish, long-term bullish. Here's why. This is the range of risk traditional investors face. Since 2010, private equity fund assets under management have grown by over 570% and are projected to reach $32 trillion by 2030. Institutional investors' share of the private market has risen from 17% to 27% in a decade. 94% of high-net-worth investors now hold alternative investments. Its selling points are: low volatility, diversification, and uncorrelated returns. The reality, however, is: volatility for money laundering. Opaqueness does not equal stability. Asset prices are constantly adjusting. You simply cannot predict when this will happen.

Now imagine what will happen to Bitcoin when all this happens. All risks will be repriced. But Bitcoin's volatility relative to traditional assets has been declining for years. Transparent ledger, real-time settlement. No valuation methods based on fantasy. The recommended weighting is for reference only. Actual allocation will increase, and the recommended weighting may increase accordingly.

When the bailout plan arrives—and it will eventually—this asset will be the first to smell its scent.

Despite the government/Federal Reserve's vehement denial of ample liquidity.For a decade, private equity firms have been touting low volatility and portfolio diversification. This is essentially volatility whitewashing. Not pricing in market capitalization doesn't mean there are no losses. It means problems won't be discovered until it's too late. And now, it's too late.

Bitcoin's position is rising as the illusion of a fractional-reserve credit system for fiat currencies stumbles from one crisis to another. 🧵

Liquidity is under pressure. The MOVE index is soaring. The US Dollar Index (DXY) is nearing the warning line of 100.50. Credit conditions are tightening in private equity and AI-related sectors. Inflation expectations are currently rising significantly. The macroeconomic outlook is not optimistic.

Stock markets are reacting sluggishly. However, this year, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) for major stock indices is diverging—prices are hitting new highs while momentum is waning. This is a typical late-cycle top pattern. The market expects a soft landing for the economy. But the credit market is not.

Bitcoin's resilience last month stemmed from two factors. The capitulation sell-off triggered by the February lows cleared out previously accumulated leverage—the excessive leverage built up before 2025. Derivatives further compressed volatility before 2025. But this was merely structural support, not genuine strength. Given that all risk assets face typical 10-15% drops, this buffer no longer exists. The February lows have resurfaced.

Inflows into Bitcoin ETFs surged again in March, but may have peaked and begun to decline.

Short-term bearish, long-term bullish. Here's why. This is the range of risk traditional investors face. Since 2010, private equity fund assets under management have grown by over 570% and are projected to reach $32 trillion by 2030. Institutional investors' share of the private market has risen from 17% to 27% in a decade. 94% of high-net-worth investors now hold alternative investments. Its selling points are: low volatility, diversification, and uncorrelated returns. The reality, however, is: volatility for money laundering. Opaqueness does not equal stability. Asset prices are constantly adjusting. You simply cannot predict when this will happen.

Now imagine what will happen to Bitcoin when all this happens. All risks will be repriced. But Bitcoin's volatility relative to traditional assets has been declining for years. Transparent ledger, real-time settlement. No valuation methods based on fantasy. The recommended weighting is for reference only. Actual allocation will increase, and the recommended weighting may increase accordingly.

When the bailout plan arrives—and it will eventually—this asset will be the first to smell its scent.

Despite the government/Federal Reserve's vehement denial of ample liquidity.For a decade, private equity firms have been touting low volatility and portfolio diversification. This is essentially volatility whitewashing. Not pricing in market capitalization doesn't mean there are no losses. It means problems won't be discovered until it's too late. And now, it's too late.

Bitcoin's position is rising as the illusion of a fractional-reserve credit system for fiat currencies stumbles from one crisis to another. 🧵

Liquidity is under pressure. The MOVE index is soaring. The US Dollar Index (DXY) is nearing the warning line of 100.50. Credit conditions are tightening in private equity and AI-related sectors. Inflation expectations are currently rising significantly. The macroeconomic outlook is not optimistic.

Stock markets are reacting sluggishly. However, this year, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) for major stock indices is diverging—prices are hitting new highs while momentum is waning. This is a typical late-cycle top pattern. The market expects a soft landing for the economy. But the credit market is not.

Bitcoin's resilience last month stemmed from two factors. The capitulation sell-off triggered by the February lows cleared out previously accumulated leverage—the excessive leverage built up before 2025. Derivatives further compressed volatility before 2025. But this was merely structural support, not genuine strength. Given that all risk assets face typical 10-15% drops, this buffer no longer exists. The February lows have resurfaced.

Inflows into Bitcoin ETFs surged again in March, but may have peaked and begun to decline.

Short-term bearish, long-term bullish. Here's why. This is the range of risk traditional investors face. Since 2010, private equity fund assets under management have grown by over 570% and are projected to reach $32 trillion by 2030. Institutional investors' share of the private market has risen from 17% to 27% in a decade. 94% of high-net-worth investors now hold alternative investments. Its selling points are: low volatility, diversification, and uncorrelated returns. The reality, however, is: volatility for money laundering. Opaqueness does not equal stability. Asset prices are constantly adjusting. You simply cannot predict when this will happen.

Now imagine what will happen to Bitcoin when all this happens. All risks will be repriced. But Bitcoin's volatility relative to traditional assets has been declining for years. Transparent ledger, real-time settlement. No valuation methods based on fantasy. The recommended weighting is for reference only. Actual allocation will increase, and the recommended weighting may increase accordingly.

When the bailout plan arrives—and it will eventually—this asset will be the first to smell its scent.

Despite the government/Federal Reserve's vehement denial of ample liquidity.For a decade, private equity firms have been touting low volatility and portfolio diversification. This is essentially volatility whitewashing. Not pricing in market capitalization doesn't mean there are no losses. It means problems won't be discovered until it's too late. And now, it's too late.

Bitcoin's position is rising as the illusion of a fractional-reserve credit system for fiat currencies stumbles from one crisis to another. 🧵

Liquidity is under pressure. The MOVE index is soaring. The US Dollar Index (DXY) is nearing the warning line of 100.50. Credit conditions are tightening in private equity and AI-related sectors. Inflation expectations are currently rising significantly. The macroeconomic outlook is not optimistic.

Stock markets are reacting sluggishly. However, this year, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) for major stock indices is diverging—prices are hitting new highs while momentum is waning. This is a typical late-cycle top pattern. The market expects a soft landing for the economy. But the credit market is not.

Bitcoin's resilience last month stemmed from two factors. The capitulation sell-off triggered by the February lows cleared out previously accumulated leverage—the excessive leverage built up before 2025. Derivatives further compressed volatility before 2025. But this was merely structural support, not genuine strength. Given that all risk assets face typical 10-15% drops, this buffer no longer exists. The February lows have resurfaced.

Inflows into Bitcoin ETFs surged again in March, but may have peaked and begun to decline.

Short-term bearish, long-term bullish. Here's why. This is the range of risk traditional investors face. Since 2010, private equity fund assets under management have grown by over 570% and are projected to reach $32 trillion by 2030. Institutional investors' share of the private market has risen from 17% to 27% in a decade. 94% of high-net-worth investors now hold alternative investments. Its selling points are: low volatility, diversification, and uncorrelated returns. The reality, however, is: volatility for money laundering. Opaqueness does not equal stability. Asset prices are constantly adjusting. You simply cannot predict when this will happen.

Now imagine what will happen to Bitcoin when all this happens. All risks will be repriced. But Bitcoin's volatility relative to traditional assets has been declining for years. Transparent ledger, real-time settlement. No valuation methods based on fantasy. The recommended weighting is for reference only. Actual allocation will increase, and the recommended weighting may increase accordingly.

When the bailout plan arrives—and it will eventually—this asset will be the first to smell its scent.

Despite the government/Federal Reserve's vehement denial of ample liquidity.For a decade, private equity firms have been touting low volatility and portfolio diversification. This is essentially volatility whitewashing. Not pricing in market capitalization doesn't mean there are no losses. It means problems won't be discovered until it's too late. And now, it's too late.

Bitcoin's position is rising as the illusion of a fractional-reserve credit system for fiat currencies stumbles from one crisis to another. 🧵

Liquidity is under pressure. The MOVE index is soaring. The US Dollar Index (DXY) is nearing the warning line of 100.50. Credit conditions are tightening in private equity and AI-related sectors. Inflation expectations are currently rising significantly. The macroeconomic outlook is not optimistic.

Stock markets are reacting sluggishly. However, this year, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) for major stock indices is diverging—prices are hitting new highs while momentum is waning. This is a typical late-cycle top pattern. The market expects a soft landing for the economy. But the credit market is not.

Bitcoin's resilience last month stemmed from two factors. The capitulation sell-off triggered by the February lows cleared out previously accumulated leverage—the excessive leverage built up before 2025. Derivatives further compressed volatility before 2025. But this was merely structural support, not genuine strength. Given that all risk assets face typical 10-15% drops, this buffer no longer exists. The February lows have resurfaced.

Inflows into Bitcoin ETFs surged again in March, but may have peaked and begun to decline.

Short-term bearish, long-term bullish. Here's why. This is the range of risk traditional investors face. Since 2010, private equity fund assets under management have grown by over 570% and are projected to reach $32 trillion by 2030. Institutional investors' share of the private market has risen from 17% to 27% in a decade. 94% of high-net-worth investors now hold alternative investments. Its selling points are: low volatility, diversification, and uncorrelated returns. The reality, however, is: volatility for money laundering. Opaqueness does not equal stability. Asset prices are constantly adjusting. You simply cannot predict when this will happen.

Now imagine what will happen to Bitcoin when all this happens. All risks will be repriced. But Bitcoin's volatility relative to traditional assets has been declining for years. Transparent ledger, real-time settlement. No valuation methods based on fantasy. The recommended weighting is for reference only. Actual allocation will increase, and the recommended weighting may increase accordingly.

When the bailout plan arrives—and it will eventually—this asset will be the first to smell its scent.

Despite the government/Federal Reserve's vehement denial of ample liquidity.For a decade, private equity firms have been touting low volatility and portfolio diversification. This is essentially volatility whitewashing. Not pricing in market capitalization doesn't mean there are no losses. It means problems won't be discovered until it's too late. And now, it's too late.

Bitcoin's position is rising as the illusion of a fractional-reserve credit system for fiat currencies stumbles from one crisis to another. 🧵

Liquidity is under pressure. The MOVE index is soaring. The US Dollar Index (DXY) is nearing the warning line of 100.50. Credit conditions are tightening in private equity and AI-related sectors. Inflation expectations are currently rising significantly. The macroeconomic outlook is not optimistic.

Stock markets are reacting sluggishly. However, this year, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) for major stock indices is diverging—prices are hitting new highs while momentum is waning. This is a typical late-cycle top pattern. The market expects a soft landing for the economy. But the credit market is not.

Bitcoin's resilience last month stemmed from two factors. The capitulation sell-off triggered by the February lows cleared out previously accumulated leverage—the excessive leverage built up before 2025. Derivatives further compressed volatility before 2025. But this was merely structural support, not genuine strength. Given that all risk assets face typical 10-15% drops, this buffer no longer exists. The February lows have resurfaced.

Inflows into Bitcoin ETFs surged again in March, but may have peaked and begun to decline.

Short-term bearish, long-term bullish. Here's why. This is the range of risk traditional investors face. Since 2010, private equity fund assets under management have grown by over 570% and are projected to reach $32 trillion by 2030. Institutional investors' share of the private market has risen from 17% to 27% in a decade. 94% of high-net-worth investors now hold alternative investments. Its selling points are: low volatility, diversification, and uncorrelated returns. The reality, however, is: volatility for money laundering. Opaqueness does not equal stability. Asset prices are constantly adjusting. You simply cannot predict when this will happen.

Now imagine what will happen to Bitcoin when all this happens. All risks will be repriced. But Bitcoin's volatility relative to traditional assets has been declining for years. Transparent ledger, real-time settlement. No valuation methods based on fantasy. The recommended weighting is for reference only. Actual allocation will increase, and the recommended weighting may increase accordingly.

When the bailout plan arrives—and it will eventually—this asset will be the first to smell its scent.

Despite the government/Federal Reserve's vehement denial of ample liquidity.