Finally, someone agrees! I can't understand why everyone thinks SBF can save the crypto market?! A person who misappropriated user funds, a person who played with extreme leverage! Which is reliable: virtue or talent? If he were reliable in either of these two aspects, he wouldn't be in this situation today! Okay, let's not talk about virtue in the crypto world, let's talk about talent. In the financial field, truly talented people are never the most adventurous, but those who are both courageous and resourceful, balancing risk and return. Yes, he was resourceful, as SEA said, he didn't use his own money for the risks, but user money. But isn't the price he paid for those risks his own freedom?! Can you say that such a person has the ability to save the crypto market? As for investment acumen, has everyone forgotten? After FTX's bankruptcy, many American institutions returned so-called "political donations." We all know that some funds couldn't be returned, and these funds determined SBF's resources and connections. Therefore, SBF's so-called investment acumen may not actually stem from investment insight. It's very difficult for Chinese-owned CEXs or VCs to integrate into the elite circles of the US, so while their investment acumen may seem inferior to SBF's, the real difference isn't investment skills, but rather their background!