A few days ago, I thought of a very practical question: If in the future AI does my work, runs tasks, earns me money, and automatically pays me—how will I know if it's actually done its job? If it just spouts nonsense and then asks me to automatically transfer money to it, who would tolerate that? 😅 This is actually the biggest pain point facing all AI agents today: capable, but not transparent; able to execute, but without proof. It's hard to truly trust them. And this collaboration between @brevis_zk and @GoKiteAI really gets to the heart of the matter. To put it simply, in terms anyone can understand, it goes like this: #Brevis is responsible for proving the AI isn't messing around (ZK verification computation process) #Kite is responsible for managing the money and permissions (on-chain settlement + identity authorization) In other words, in the future, if an AI wants to collect money, exercise permissions, or trigger a payment, it must first use mathematical proof that it actually did the work. It's not the AI that has the final say, but proof that counts. The future may look something like this: AI: Task completed, please pay On-chain: Proof verified, payment approved Automatic settlement in stablecoins 🔍Fully traceable and auditable process This is the foundation for a large-scale agent economy: transparent, trustworthy, and verifiable. So I think this collaboration is incredibly meaningful. It's not just about adding buffs, but truly addresses the most critical shortcoming of the AI economy: trust infrastructure. It's moving AI from the black box era to the era of accountability. In a nutshell: AI does the work, ZK verifies, and settlement is done on-chain—this is what the future should look like. I'm optimistic about this trend and look forward to it truly ushering the agent economy into the next phase. 🚀 #Brevis #Kite #BrevisExplained #KaitoAI #Yaps #Yapping