Ecosystem Symbiosis vs. Parasitism: The Delicate Relationship Between Lista and Other DApps on the BNB Chain Is Lista's prosperity truly nourishing the entire BNB DeFi ecosystem, or is it draining liquidity and users from other protocols? In-depth Analysis of Ecosystem Relationships: A healthy relationship should be one of symbiosis. Lista provides the base currency (USD1) and interest-bearing assets (SLISBNB), acting as the "utilities" for other DApps (such as DEXs, lending protocols, and games), reducing their user acquisition and funding costs. However, if Lista excessively locks up funds within its own protocol through excessively high yields, leading to a liquidity crunch in other protocols, it may become parasitic. Quantitative Assessment: Observe two ratios: 1. "Outflow Rate": What percentage of USD1 borrowed from Lista flows into other protocols for farming or trading? 2. "Empowerment Multiplier": Does Lista's TVL growth simultaneously drive the TVL growth of its deeply integrated partner protocols? Risk Warning: If a protocol creates an excessively strong "black hole effect" within its ecosystem, it's unhealthy in the long run, potentially provoking resentment from other developers and even prompting the ecosystem leader (such as BNB Chain) to implement implicit controls. Dialectical Viewpoint: A great foundational protocol should be like fertile soil, allowing more plants (applications) to grow on it. Lista's value will ultimately be reflected in how many thriving "upper-layer applications" it cultivates, not just its own TVL (TVL) figures. Do you appreciate protocols that play a "cornerstone" role in an ecosystem more, or "star" protocols that leverage ecosystem resources to achieve extreme growth? @lista_dao #USD1BestInvestmentStrategyListaDAO $LISTA