If you haven't used Plasma, you might think it's no different from those public chains with explosively high TPS and low transaction fees. After all, these days, every blockchain is touting itself as a decentralized exchange (DEX) or a fancy DeFi platform, piling up metrics and all trying to claim they're "suitable for payments." But there's a lot of hype behind this. Simply put, most chains' so-called "payments" are just about sending your coins out—a simple transfer. This kind of operation, while called a payment, is essentially just a middleman. You're only responsible for sending, not how it's used. True "payments" trigger business logic, state changes, and even protocol-level interactions—a world of difference from ordinary transfers. After using Plasma, I felt completely different. This chain doesn't treat itself as a trading platform at all. It's designed as a "payment protocol chain," focusing not on making coins move quickly, but on ensuring that every payment generates action and value within the system. Pretty novel, right? For example, on Plasma, you can directly input stablecoins into contracts without needing to go through any complicated authorization or asset authorization processes. You can also synchronize payment actions with internal states; the system immediately records the transaction upon payment and automatically recognizes and merges the value of various currencies for a unified response. In short, the entire process is automated and streamlined. I previously saw someone using Plasma to implement paid voting in a DAO, and the process was incredibly efficient. Traditionally, users had to pay with platform tokens, authorize the contract, manually transfer funds, update the backend database, calculate voting results, and distribute rewards—a complex process involving multiple layers of manual intervention and backend coupling. Now? Users simply pay with stablecoins on-chain, and the contract handles the receiving and voting authorization in one step. Votes are calculated directly on-chain, and the next phase contract is automatically activated when a threshold is reached. The entire process requires no servers, no databases, and no one monitors the transfers; all actions are transparent on-chain. What's this called? Plasma's underlying architecture isn't designed for simple "on-chain transfers." It emphasizes a protocol model where payment is the business, the driver, and the result. To draw an analogy, it's like buying a pancake on the street; you not only pay, but the system also automatically adds spicy strips – the entire chain understands your business needs. What is the role of the $XPL token? It's like a scoreboard, clearly tracking all resources. It's also convenient for developers; they don't need to learn new languages, and they're not afraid of external middleware interfering. They can simply insert payment actions into the contract logic, and the system will handle it automatically. Therefore, Plasma isn't a traditional database, nor is it just about record-keeping; it's more like a flexible on-chain business coordinator. Developers don't just deploy cold, impersonal contracts; they truly write protocols that understand the "payment" desire and what to do after a user pays. This kind of "payment awareness" is really needed in blockchain; it's the first time I've seen it. Is Plasma truly the future trend? Its design philosophy is definitely different from most others. This thing understands payments. Compared to those chains that only move coins around, isn't it worth following? What do you think? @Plasma #Plasma $XPL

"They are all talking to me" "Xi, are you here?" #meme

Binance punished several typical market makers, and the reason they are typical is because their performance is very bad: only selling but not buying. What's strange is that when the market makers of MOVE, GPS and other project parties were punished, but did not submit evidence to defend themselves or refute, will they verify that the project parties and market makers are actually snakes and rats, and the market makers can only bear the blame for the anger and remain silent, and always doubt the trust of the repurchase. These three coins have been completely blocked and will not buy any tokens. A project with a valuation of billions of dollars, with a 24-hour dex trading volume of only $140,000. Is it necessary to buy altcoins? $MOVE $GPS $SHELL {future}(SHELLUSDT) {future}(GPSUSDT) {future}(MOVEUSDT) #Repurchase #Market Maker Breaking

As an old leek who entered the cryptocurrency industry in 2017. I think the fear of heights and panic among retail investors now is not much different from the sentiment of a 17 year pancake breaking through 10000 RMB and a 20 year pancake breaking through 20000 USD. Even the same. Everyone feels that there is no knockoff season, and everyone feels that the big cake has risen too much and is about to rebound or collapse. However, history always rhymes with the repetition of cycles. Firm confidence$ ETH $ETH # BTC hits a new high of 97k # When will BTC break through 100000?

So cute, I love this one the most

Happy Halloween! 🎃🦇🕸

Twitter (X) has been working hard, so pay attention~Just do it well~~~~🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹

#Wink Jangar