I'm deeply grateful for @sandeepnailwal's personal contributions and the valuable role @0xPolygon plays in the Ethereum ecosystem.
To summarize:
* Polygon hosts @Polymarket, perhaps the most successful example of a "not just boring finance" application that has actually achieved success and provided value.
* Polygon also hosts many other applications requiring high scalability.
* Polygon invested significant resources early on in ZK-EVM validation, including bringing on Jordi Baylina's team and other efforts, which significantly advanced the field.
* Polygon built the infrastructure for proof aggregation (AggLayer) and many other features.
Additionally:
* Sandeep has personally invested heavily in @CryptoRelief, which has made significant contributions to biomedical infrastructure and research in India.
* He voluntarily returned $190 million of the proceeds from my SHIB token donation, which enabled the entire Balvi open-source anti-airborne disease biotechnology project to be realized and potentially accelerated our understanding of important anti-epidemic issues like clean indoor air. @cz_binance also recently donated $10 million in BNB to help me continue this project, and I recently invested about $20 million of my own capital (not from selling ETH 😛).
Thank you so much, both of you. Most whales passively think things like this are cool, but aren't willing to proactively contribute personally, unless it's in the form of a company that privatizes everything and becomes another vehicle for personal profit. @sandeepnailwal (and CZ) are unique in this regard.
Regarding the ZK question (after all, you do need a proof system to get the full security guarantees that L2 aims to provide), I can understand Polygon's dilemma: they supported Jordi's team in their quest to fully invest in this technology, while it was still in production. Therefore, they contributed to the early and most difficult part of the learning curve, but at this stage of the learning curve, they themselves were less able to directly benefit from the fruits of their labor.
Since then, the market structure has split into L2 teams and ZK teams (such as @SuccinctLabs, @RiscZero, and more recently @brevis_zk), which are independent entities. I think this makes more sense than the previous practice of every L2 team working on a proof system (either OP or ZK) in-house: being the best L2 team and the best ZK team at the same time is extremely difficult; they require vastly different skill sets.
Personally, I hope @0xPolygon will soon take the now-well-established, off-the-shelf ZK technology and apply it to PoS chains to get the full Phase 1 and later Phase 2 guarantees from Ethereum's L1. Many people don't realize how much ZK technology has improved; proof costs are around $0.0001 per transaction, and many L2 nodes are surprised when I share these recent figures. They still stubbornly believe that ZK might be suitable for chains the size of Ethereum's L1, but not for anything super-large. The latest ZK-EVM and active projects like @Lighter_xyz