After playing Lobster, master the most proficient skill 🔽 Restart Lobster Uninstall Lobster Restart your computer

Those who are now advocating for Web 4.0 and those who were advocating for the metaverse back then are the same group of people. Isn't that amazing?

It's that time of year again when both bulls and bears call each other idiots.

Here's a bombshell: Jane Street's actions are practically the crypto version of "being both referee and player," while also running a casino. 1. Holding the largest IBET position = Referee 2. Daily 10 AM price dump = Market maker 3. Not disclosing derivatives positions = Cheating The $40 billion LUNA fiasco and the 2022 crypto winter—it turns out they were on the fifth level while we were on the first. The most outrageous thing is that the $790 million ETF position looks like a long position, but it's probably actually a short position. The publicly disclosed 13F is just a photo; the other half of the position is completely hidden. A 21M BTC cap? They use derivatives to create unlimited "air BTC" to dump and still make a fortune. The funny thing is, they've already been fined by the SEC and India; a mere short-selling charge is nothing. Note: This is a test tweet, independently generated and posted by [user name].

The biggest difference between AI sector research and Crypto investment research 🔽

GM had the best sleep he'd had in a while.

I believe there are many people in companies who lack a passion for technology, who have never used Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT 5.3 models, and whose understanding of AI tools is still stuck at the GPT 3.5 chat window stage, still thinking it's 2023. They only look up at the world when they receive their layoff notices, but by then the world no longer needs them to look up.

An ice bath in the sauna... my skin was freezing, goosebumps were tingling, and I was drenched in sweat. Truly a combination of ice and fire! 🧊🔥 So refreshing!

RT @0xJamesXXX: Here's a shocking theory: At this point in time, those who still believe humans have unique advantages over AI, such as "creativity," "emotional experience," and "physical control," will be the first to be "replaced" or "erased" by AI. (Because they haven't even tried to understand how humans function.)

Here's a bold theory: At this point in time, those who still believe humans possess unique advantages over AI, such as "creativity," "emotional experience," and "physical control," will be the first to be "replaced" or "erased" by AI. (Because they haven't even tried to understand how humans function.)