The environment was filled with fear 😂 Mention: $BULLA $GWEI $POWER #writetoearnupgrade #MEME #saifuuuu {future}(POWERUSDT) {future}(GWEIUSDT) {future}(BULLAUSDT)

Viewing AIFT, SunPump, the SunWukong ecosystem, JUST, and BitTorrent together resembles an end-to-end "ecosystem pipeline": AI and content first gather attention; issuance and trading transform attention into interaction; DeFi primitives convert interaction into capital turnover; distribution and storage ensure usability; and finally, initial hype solidifies into a long-term path. The true power of this pipeline lies not in the activity at any one stage, but in its ability to consistently transfer the results of each step to the next, guiding users from "trying it out" to "frequent use." To participate more efficiently in this pipeline, the safest strategy is to streamline your own process: separate interaction from holdings; minimize permissions and clean them up regularly; fix position limits and pre-define exit criteria; delay decisions on unfamiliar contracts; and summarize and review each participation. A stable process allows you to manage irreversible risks and focus on long-term collaboration and compounding. @JustinSun #TRONEcoStar @officialainft @SunPump_meme @sunwukong_zh @sunwukong_dex @DeFi_JUST @BitTorrent_Official _Official

Products like Sunwukong DEX are better suited for a "standardized training approach": the market doesn't lack opportunities, it lacks executable discipline. Many people lose money not because they misjudge the direction, but because their actions are inconsistent—entering based on intuition, adding to positions based on emotion, and relying on luck for stop-loss orders. The more inconsistent the actions, the greater the volatility, the easier it is to be led by the market. A more sustainable approach is to create a hard checklist: Set a fixed position size, pre-determine stop-loss levels, take profits in stages, and strictly adhere to drawdown controls; review slippage and execution quality after each trade; keep authorizations small and short-term, and clear them after use. Transform trading from a stimulant into a skill; only then will long-term compounding occur. @JustinSun #TRONEcoStar @sunwukong_dex

Of course! Here is a brief summary of your insightful analysis. Your article delves into the dual standards of token listings on decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and centralized exchanges (CEXs), a topic that Changpeng Zhao (CZ) focuses on. You argue that because CEX listings are often seen as a sign of approval, expectations are higher. The core issue you pointed out is the need for clearer communication regarding the true meaning of listing. Hopefully, this is helpful.

Written by: Alertforalpha Compilation: Vernacular Blockchain   Ethereum holders are no strangers to the drastic market volatility. But this cycle? It feels like a roller coaster is going down.     When Bitcoin hits a new high, Ethereum almost stagnates and even continues to bleed. There are no new fascinating stories. No explosive growth. It’s just a slow erosion of market dominance, while faster and lower-cost competitors like Solana have stolen the limelight. Now, Vitalik Buterin has come up with a radical new proposal that could change the way Ethereum works forever. But is it too late?   Vitalik's new bet: Replace EVM   At the core of Ethereum is the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) - a decentralized engine that drives smart contracts on the network. It has been the cornerstone since the birth of Ethereum. But now, Vitalik suggests a thorough reform.   In a post at the Ethereum Magicians, a gathering place for Ethereum developers, Vitalik proposed the idea of ​​replacing EVM with a new architecture called RSIV.   Simply put:   The existing contracts remain functionally complete.   New contracts can be written in Rust (a modern, extremely popular programming language) and Solidity.   Interoperability will be maintained between the old system and the new system.   Goal? Significantly improve Ethereum's execution efficiency and solve one of its biggest expansion bottlenecks.   Vitalik even suggested that this could be the only viable path to simplifying the bloated execution layer of Ethereum—especially after abandoning the earlier sharding promise.   In theory, this sounds transformative.   In reality? RSIV may take years to come out.   This is the real problem.   ETH stagnates, SOL rises   Competitors didn't stop as Ethereum discussed its next major upgrade.   Especially SOL, it is already far ahead:   4.9 billion transactions have been processed in the past three months, far exceeding Ethereum. Weekly network revenue reached US$21 billion, accounting for nearly 48% of the market share. SOL's decentralized trading platform (DEX) trading volume is now ahead of all chains.   At the same time, Ethereum's data is not optimistic:   The ETH/BTC ratio hit a record low. ETH ETFs continue to lose assets, while Bitcoin ETFs attract billions of dollars. Ethereum's market dominance fell to 7%, about 66% lower than its historical level. Price performance? Bitcoin has risen nearly 50% over the past year, while Ethereum has fallen by 50%.   Wall Street's choice is clear. The hottest funds in the crypto market no longer flow to Ethereum, but instead move towards Bitcoin and faster Layer 1 chains, such as SOL. Even big players like Galaxy Digital are re-layouting: On-chain data shows they have exchanged $100 million worth of ETH for SOL.   The cruel truth: ETH is losing its strait   The current situation of Ethereum sounds surprisingly similar to that of the former tech giant Nokia.   Just like Nokia in the smartphone war, Ethereum has created a world-changing platform of excellence…but when newer, faster competitors emerge, it has difficulty adapting quickly.   The cruel reality is: Ethereum has lost its narrative in this cycle.   In 2017, Ethereum was synonymous with ICO.   In 2020, it is the king of NFT and DeFi.   In 2024, the biggest trend in the crypto market is memecoins – and this happens almost entirely on SO l.   Ethereum does not have a compelling use case to drive large-scale new user adoption. Instead, it splits into expensive Layer 2, clumsy cross-chain bridges and user experience friction.   Is RSIV a game changer, or is it too late?   Vitalik's RSIV proposal is ambitious. Bold and fearless. It is exactly the major thought that Ethereum needs.   But the crypto world changes like the speed of light. The reality is that even if RSIV is flawless, it can take years to build, test and deploy.   By then, Solana, Sui, Aptos and more may have been ahead of the pack.   Ethereum is not hopeless yet—at least not yet. It still has about $50 billion in total locked value (TVL), still attracts loyal giant whale capital and still carries the respect of the institutions.   But it is standing at the intersection:   Continue to escalate slowly and cautiously - may gradually fade out of the historical stage. Or act quickly and innovate boldly to strive to regain leadership in a rapidly changing market.   RSIV could be the beginning of a revival.   It may also be the first coffin nail if Ethereum acts too late.

After my first 2 billion BTT in the election, all coins are lmao Until now, I'm still praying But I learned my lesson and only bought at lows, which is 0.67 for me to enter #binancealphaalert #meme