In the crypto world, one of the most heartbreaking phrases is, "I bought this before." When BTC was at 100,000, some said, "I bought it when it was at 100." When ETH was at 4,000 USDT, some said, "I bought it during the ICO." When SOL was at 200 USDT, some said, "I bought it when it was at 2 USDT." We've heard this countless times. It was precisely in the early days of the crypto world that so many stories of selling too early created a large number of "diamond hands" (those who bought too much at the peak). Returning to today's topic, CryCry and 1 went alpha, and their performances were worlds apart. 1 surged, while CryCry's initial rise lacked momentum and began to fall. Both had narratives, but why didn't CryCry double? Thinking back to why I bought CryCry. In the past two years of meme cycles, I made too many mistakes, buying too many memes that went to zero and selling too many that skyrocketed. My final choice was to buy what I understood and embrace popular culture. Attention equals price. However, popular culture doesn't necessarily translate into price. To paraphrase He Yi, let's wait and see. Currently, with the VC coin narrative in a bankruptcy cycle, memes are the only remaining opportunity for quick riches. Truly enduring popular culture always experiences ups and downs. Memes are no exception. Historically, several major memes, like Doge Shib, have repeatedly approached zero. Hopefully, CryCryHorse will survive. Hopefully, Diamond Hand can win this time.