Last night I worked until almost midnight, my phone only had 8% battery left and I was still getting pressured by the client for more information. A guy in the quantitative trading group asked: "Can't DEX fees be less like opening a blind box?" Before I could reply, he added insult to injury: "Data is fed to AI, and all the credit goes to the platform..." I sipped my cold coffee and opened @OpenledgerHQ, feeling a bit overwhelmed. OpenLedger's logic is very robust: it records the contributions of data/models/agents on the blockchain, uses Proof of Attribution to trace the source, and distributes rewards according to contribution. Two things have been crucial in the past week: ① Partnering with Injective to pave a faster and more MEV-resistant path for "automated execution"; ② Implementing AI dynamic fees within the Algebra framework: FeeScore (0-100) is overlaid with optional signals such as trading behavior, volatility/liquidity, reputation/Proof-of-Human/activity participation, etc., with higher participation resulting in more reasonable fees; no participation results in default fees, without coercion. The engineers think: This isn't just empty talk; it's about making incentives a protocol-level engineering feat... I admit I'm a little tempted. The next step is to see if MAIN AI DEX can generate real transaction volume and retention rates.