According to Cointelegraph, Ethereum community members Kevin Owocki and Devansh Mehta proposed a dynamic fee structure proposal for the Ethereum application layer on April 27 to balance the income creation of application developers and the fairness of fee withdrawals. The solution uses a square root function to calculate the cost ratio, and the fund pool is charged at a higher proportion, with a fee cap of 1% when it exceeds $10 million to support application developers and encourage project growth. Owocki and Mehta's proposal to balance Ethereum application developers' revenue and profitability reflects a growing number of calls for reforming the cost structure and value accumulation mechanism to maintain Ethereum's economic viability relative to competitive networks.
Ethereum community members propose new fee structure for application layer
数字货币大师
04-28 08:13
Follow
Focus
1. 4月27日，以太坊社区成员Kevin Owocki和Devansh Mehta为以太坊应用层提出动态费用结构提案，旨在平衡开发者收入创造与费用提取公平性。
2. 该方案用平方根函数计算成本比率，对资金池收取更高比例费用。
3. 当资金池超过1000万美元时，费用上限设为1%，以此支持应用开发者并鼓励项目发展。
4. Owocki和Mehta的提案反映出越来越多改革成本结构和价值积累机制的呼声。
5. 目的是维持以太坊相对于竞争网络的经济可行性 。
Helpful
Not Helpful
Play DisclaimerAll content on this website, hyperlinks, related applications, forums, blog media accounts, and other platforms published by users are sourced from third-party platforms and platform users. BiJieWang makes no warranties of any kind regarding the website and its content. All blockchain-related data and other content on the website are for user learning and research purposes only, and do not constitute investment, legal, or any other professional advice. Any content published by BiJieWang users or other third-party platforms is the sole responsibility of the individual, and has nothing to do with BiJieWang. BiJieWang is not responsible for any losses arising from the use of information on this website. You should use the related data and content with caution and bear all risks associated with it. We strongly recommend that you independently research, review, analyze, and verify the content.
No comments yet